Traditional CMS vs. Headless CMS: Which is Right for Your Business?

Traditional CMS vs. Headless CMS: Which is Right for Your Business?
Author image

Makayla Adams

Senior Marketing Coordinator

Share this article on:

As the landscape of content management systems (CMS) evolves, developers and marketers face critical decisions when choosing the right CMS for their projects. Traditional and headless CMS each come with unique features and advantages. In this blog, we'll dissect the components of headless and traditional CMS architectures and provide insights on how to blend the best of both worlds.

Traditional CMS - The Monolithic Approach

Components:

1. Monolithic Architecture

Traditional CMS systems have a monolithic architecture, where the front end and back end are tightly coupled. This setup simplifies content management but may limit flexibility.

2. Built-in Frontend

The front end and back end are tightly integrated, often offering built-in templates for content presentation. This simplifies website creation but may limit customization options.

3. Content and Presentation in One

In a traditional CMS, content creation and presentation are intertwined. Changes to one aspect may affect the other, making it less flexible for adapting to different channels or devices.

4. Ease of Use for Marketers

Traditional CMS is renowned for its user-friendly interfaces, allowing marketers to create and manage content without deep technical knowledge.

Headless CMS - Decoupling for Flexibility

Components:

1. Decoupled Architecture

Headless CMS decouple the backend (content repository) from the front end, offering greater flexibility. Content is managed separately from the presentation.

2. APIs for Content Delivery

Content is delivered through APIs, enabling developers to fetch and display content on various platforms, such as websites, mobile apps, or IoT devices.

3. Freedom for Frontend Developers

Frontend developers have the freedom to use the technology stack of their choice. They can create custom interfaces and designs without restrictions imposed by a built-in front end.

4. Scalability and Adaptability

Headless CMS excel in scalability and adaptability, making it ideal for projects with diverse front end requirements or those targeting multiple platforms.

What is Traditional CMS?

A traditional CMS is a content management system in which the backend, where the content storage and editing are located, is tightly coupled with the front end, where the presentation layer is. Essentially, the content creation and content storage aspects and how digital content is displayed on a website are managed on a single platform. 

This type of CMS is common on websites that use HTML to structure and present the content. Some common examples of traditional content management systems are WordPress, Wix, and Joomla.

Content Creation and Workflows

A traditional CMS helps simplify content creation on a website since these systems, like WordPress, typically feature pre-built templates for content creation and presentation. They are open-source, which means users can access, change, and enhance the source code. However, customization options may be limited with built-in templates. These platforms also often have built-in SEO tools that can help optimize the website for search engines. 

Content Distribution

A traditional CMS is ideal for content creation on websites since the front-end presentation and back-end website content are united. However, since the content creation and presentation are integrated, changing one of them often impacts the other. This makes it more challenging to distribute to other channels or devices. Integrations with other tools and services can be difficult with traditional CMS platforms since custom web development or plugins are often needed.

User Experience

Traditional CMS is known for having interfaces that are easy for users to operate. This creates an accessible user experience that doesn’t require creators to be too tech-savvy. These platforms can also make for a better customer experience if an amateur creator is looking to make a website, blog, etc.

What is Headless CMS?

A headless CMS has a backend only. It stores and manages content on a different platform from the front end presentation layer, decoupling the content from how it’s displayed on a website or app. A headless content management system offers more flexibility for developers to create unique user interfaces and allows content editors to manage content independently. Examples of headless CMS are Contentful, Storyblok, and Strapi.

Content Creation and Workflows

Headless CMS platforms only feature a backend, where the content repository is. This means that the content is managed separately from the presentation. Since they are decoupled, content that is created with headless CMS cannot be presented directly like with traditional CMS. Headless CMS offer extensibility, which allows developers to add new capabilities without needing to redesign the entire system.

Content Distribution

To distribute content with a headless CMS, you first need a separate front end. Once you have your front end set up, you can use Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) to transfer and deliver the content to different platforms, such as websites, mobile applications, and IoT devices. 

User Experience

When it comes to using a headless CMS, developers have more flexibility. They can create custom designs and interfaces without the restrictions of built-in templates. They can also use the programming language they desire, which can enhance the functionality of a headless CMS platform and improve the developer experience.

However, for providers who are not developers and don’t have a high level of technical knowledge or developer resources, headless CMS can be trickier to understand and use. Using this type of system requires more technical know-how to set up and manage. 

Comparing Each CMS

Traditional CMS is different from headless CMS in a few ways. The main difference is in the system architecture. Traditional systems have a monolithic architecture that couples the content creation and presentation aspects. Meanwhile, headless systems feature a decoupled architecture where content is managed separately from the presentation.

Traditional CMS manage content creation and presentation together, offering enhanced simplicity. These systems are easier for users without technical knowledge to use. However, they are hard to scale and difficult to adapt to other channels. They are suitable for small businesses, personal websites, and content creators.

Headless CMS are decoupled, which allows for greater flexibility and is ideal for adapting to different platforms and devices. These systems require more technical knowledge to manage but offer great scalability and omnichannel content delivery. They are ideal for e-commerce and personalized digital experiences.

When to Choose Headless CMS?

If you’re wondering whether your business should utilize a headless CMS solution, consider these use cases:

  • Scalability: If you want a CMS that can scale quickly without hiccups, a headless CMS is ideal because its design is highly scalable.

  • Adaptability: If your content is going out to multiple platforms, headless CMS is suitable thanks to its omnichannel content delivery capabilities.

  • Personalization: If your goal is to personalize your content for different users and audiences, headless CMS is best because its flexible architecture allows developers to tailor the content.

  • Large Dev Team: If your company has an experienced and well-versed IT team, a headless CMS is a good choice because it requires tech knowledge and a large development team.

When to Choose Traditional CMS?

If you’re curious if a traditional CMS is sufficient for your business, take these factors into account: 

  • Basic website needs: If your content creation and presentation needs are fairly basic, a traditional CMS is often sufficient for providing the necessary features without too much complexity.

  • Single channel delivery: If you only need to publish content on a website, a traditional CMS is suitable since it isn’t designed for omnichannel experiences.

  • Non-technical users: If your content editors don't have development resources and need a user-friendly system, traditional CMS are ideal because they don’t require tech-savvy users.

  • Limited budget: Businesses with lower budgets should choose traditional CMS because it sometimes has a lower set up cost.

How dotCMS Bridges the Gap

Hybrid CMS combines the flexibility of a headless CMS with the convenience of a traditional CMS. It offers a hybrid headless architecture, allowing content creators to enjoy visual editing while giving developers the freedom to build their front-end applications in their chosen framework (AngularJS, Node, React, etc.). This enables businesses to cater to diverse front-end requirements while maintaining ease of use for marketers. Experience effortless content updates, streamlined development cycles, and scalable solutions.

Choosing the right CMS is pivotal in achieving project goals. Traditional and headless each cater to different requirements. But for those seeking the best of both worlds, dotCMS and its hybrid abilities emerge as a powerful solution, striking a harmonious balance between development freedom and marketer-friendly content management. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, dotCMS positions itself at the forefront, leading the charge in Content Management System innovation.